# Risk Factors

> AN INVESTMENT IN NET INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK, INCLUDING THE RISK OF
> TOTAL LOSS. THE FUND'S DEFINING FEATURE — NO GOVERNANCE, NO DISCRETION —
> IS ALSO ITS DEFINING RISK: NOBODY CAN SAVE YOU, BECAUSE NOBODY CAN TOUCH
> ANYTHING. READ THIS SECTION AS CAREFULLY AS YOU READ THE APY TABLE. THEY
> ARE THE SAME TABLE.

Each risk below is real, specific, and drawn from the protocol
specifications — not boilerplate. Where the fund has a mitigation, it is
stated; where it merely has a disclosure, that is stated too.

## 1. Thin liquidity, by choice

This was a deliberately small offering, and the fund-owned pool opened
correspondingly shallow: at the fully subscribed close, roughly **15,000
USDG and 5,000 NET a side**. The pool has deepened since through fees,
bonds, and premium sales, but it remains thin by any market's standard.
Consequences, none of them subtle:

* **Single trades of ordinary size move the price meaningfully.** Expect
  volatility that deeper markets would absorb, plus the 5% trading fee and
  AMM slippage on top.
* **Exit capacity is limited.** Selling any meaningful fraction of your
  position into ~15,000 USDG of depth reprices the pool against you long
  before you are done. The Buyback Program (inverse bonds) is a floor bid
  near NAV, capped at 1% of liquid reserves per epoch — it is a floor, not
  an exit ramp.
* The protocol's own operations are protected in a shallow pool by
  on-chain TWAP-deviation and clip-size bounds; **your trades have no such
  protection.**

Fee inflows, bond sales, and premium sales deepen the fund-owned pool over
time; day one is the shallowest the pool is designed to be.

## 2. Unmapped-pool fee bypass

The 5% trading fee applies only to AMM pairs registered in the fee mapping.
Uniswap v3, v4, and UniswapX are live on Robinhood Chain, and **anyone can
create an unmapped NET pool that dodges the fee entirely.** Fee revenue —
which becomes 100% treasury inflow after day 30 — could be structurally
reduced if trading migrates to unmapped venues.

*Mitigation (partial):* likely bypass pools are **pre-mapped at deploy**
(Uniswap v3 NET/USDG and NET/WETH across all four fee tiers, plus the v2
NET/WETH pair, at their factory-predicted addresses — taxed from the moment
anyone creates them).

**Uniswap v4 and UniswapX are not taxable at all, and never will be.** This
is a permanent gap, not a monitoring backlog: v4 pools live inside a
singleton contract as pool IDs rather than addresses, and the fee hook is
address-keyed, so there is nothing to map. (Mapping "the v4 pool" would mean
taxing the singleton itself — which would tax every v4 pool on the chain,
NetNet's and everyone else's.) Management reviewed this on 2026-07-14 and
accepted it rather than distort the design around it.

*Mitigation (partial):* fund-owned depth keeping the canonical v2 pool the
best-execution venue. That is the only real defense — it always was; the fee
mapping was never the thing standing between NET and a bypass. A managed
race, not a solved problem, and thinner day-one depth (§1) makes the race
tighter. If flow migrates to v4, fee revenue falls and the treasury's
post-day-30 inflow falls with it.

## 3. Key custody: a single key holds the only permissioned surface

The protocol has exactly one permissioned role — the guardian key that adds
pools to the fee mapping and queues fee exemptions. Management holds it in a
Safe at `0x3Bb7A23316f82C0e984fA2E784846d8928a35f42`, and **that Safe is
configured 1-of-1**: one hardware-wallet owner, no second approver, no
recovery path. The same address is the sole holder of the pTEAM option and is
frozen into the contracts immutably at deployment.

The fund's own specification recommends 2-of-3. Management accepted the weaker
configuration; this document states so rather than let the word "multisig"
imply protection that is not there.

*What the key cannot do:* mint, pause, seize, change emissions, change the
fee rate, or alter pTEAM's strike, cap, or vesting. It cannot even *remove* a
mapped pool or an exemption — **no removal functions exist in the code** — and
pool additions are validated on-chain against the canonical Uniswap factories,
so the worst it can add is a genuine NET venue.

*What a compromise costs:* the attacker gains the pTEAM option (up to 15% of
float, exercisable only by paying 1 USDG per NET into the treasury) and the
ability to exempt an address from the fee after a timelock. Loss of the key
strands management compensation permanently. Raising the Safe's threshold does
not change its address and remains possible until deployment freezes it.

## 4. Management's option is perpetual, and it tracks supply

Management's pTEAM option is capped at 15% of circulating supply **measured at
each exercise** — not 15% of a fixed snapshot. Because circulating supply grows
with dividends and bond sales, the ceiling grows too. **Management can exercise
again after every supply increase, restoring its holding to 15% of the new
float, indefinitely.** The right does not expire.

It is also always in-the-money: the strike is 1 USDG while NET is backed at a
NAV above 1 USDG. Assume it will be exercised whenever supply grows.

*What it does not cost you:* the floor. Every exercise pays 1 USDG into
reserves for each NET minted, so backing per token can never be pushed below
1 USDG by it.

*What it does cost you:* the premium. Minting NET at 1 USDG into a treasury
whose NAV is higher drags NAV downward, toward the floor — this is one of only
two operations permitted to dilute NAV at all (the other being the epoch
dividend). Over time, a persistently inflating supply means a persistent,
recurring NAV drag from management's exercises.

Worked figures are in [Management Compensation](/team). Read them before
subscribing.

## 5. Morpho exposure

Up to **70% of treasury USDG** may be deployed to Morpho at any time. A
Morpho smart-contract failure, market insolvency, or liquidity crunch could
impair the majority of the fund's reserves. The 2% RFV haircut prices
normal conditions; it does not price a loss event. A withdraw path exists
so bond and buyback obligations can be met by unwinding, but unwinding
assumes Morpho is functioning.

## 6. No governance — the knife cuts both ways

There are **no owner functions on the emissions path** and **no
parameter-change path** anywhere short of redeployment. Consequently:

* **A bug is an immutable bug.** If the emissions formula, cap check, or
  fee split misbehaves, no multisig can pause or patch the live deployment.
* **No crisis response.** In a USDG depeg, a Morpho failure, or an oracle
  outage, the protocol keeps executing its formulas exactly as written,
  whether or not that is sensible in context.
* **Defaults are forever.** Constants tuned before deploy (spreads, clip
  sizes, caps) cannot be retuned afterward, even if they prove
  miscalibrated at this offering's scale.

The compensating control is scope: the only permissioned surface in the
protocol is the trading-fee pair mapping and whitelist, and it is
**add-only — no removal functions exist in code**. Everything else is
enforced by an invariant test suite before it is enforced by nobody.

## 7. Fee-on-transfer limitations

NET is a fee-on-transfer (FoT) token, which is a compatibility statement as
much as a design choice:

* **Uniswap v3-style routers revert** on FoT exact-output flows; the
  canonical pool must be, and is, Uniswap v2. Venues and aggregators that
  do not use FoT-safe swap paths will fail or misquote on NET.
* Integrations that assume `amountSent == amountReceived` (some vaults,
  bridges, CEX deposit flows, payment contracts) can break or strand funds.
* Buys and sells through mapped pairs bear the 5% fee on top of AMM fees
  and slippage; NET is expensive to trade by design, and the round trip
  through the fee is −10% before anything else happens.

## 8. Premium dependence of the dividend

The dividend rate is zero at or below NAV (backing per token) and reaches
its maximum only at a 1.75× premium. **If the market pays no premium, the
Shareholder Dividend Program (staking) pays nothing** — indefinitely. The
APY table in [The Fund](/mechanism) is conditional arithmetic, not an
entitlement. Additionally, the RFV hard cap can clamp or halt emissions
entirely whenever supply approaches reserves, which is precisely when
headline rates would otherwise look most attractive.

## 9. Fail-closed pauses

The protocol has **zero liveness dependency on management** — every
operational entrypoint is permissionless, and the Buyback Program requires
no caller at all. The residual liveness risk is the oracle: if no one
checkpoints the TWAP for more than 4 hours, the protocol **fails closed** —
the Distributor skips epochs (no dividends), and buyback and premium
settlement refuse to execute — until someone pokes the permissionless
`checkpoint()` and waits 30 minutes. A paused protocol never trades on a
stale price, but a paused protocol also is not paying dividends or standing
its bid. Anyone, including you, can revive it.

## 10. Oracle and TWAP risk

All pricing derives from a TWAP (valid window: 30 minutes to 4 hours) on a
single canonical Uniswap v2 pair, and the source pair is immutable. TWAPs
resist flash-loan manipulation but not sustained capital: an actor willing
to hold a distorted price across a meaningful part of the window can skew
the dividend rate and both market-making triggers together — and in a pool
this shallow (§1), holding a distorted price costs less than it would in a
deep one. The protocol's TWAP-deviation and clip bounds limit what a
distorted price can extract from the treasury per epoch; they do not
prevent the distortion.

## 11. Stablecoin and chain dependence

The 1 USDG floor is a floor **denominated in USDG**. A USDG depeg moves the
floor with it. Robinhood Chain is an Arbitrum Orbit L2; sequencer downtime
or chain-level failure suspends every mechanism described in this document,
including the ones labeled "standing."

## 12. Real-world asset positions

The [Real World Bonds](/rwa-desk) desk is live and the Manager's RWA
Sleeve holds tokenized equity positions. Equity prices can fall, and a
decline reduces the value of those positions. **Sleeve assets are held
outside the reserve and are never counted in backing or RFV**, so a fall
does not impair the floor — and by the same token, shareholders should not
read the Sleeve as support for the floor. Tokenized equities additionally
carry the issuer and redemption mechanics of their tokenization, which are
not the fund's to control.

## 13. Games of chance

WinNET, the Superstore, CLIMB, INC., COINflip, and SPACEX INVADERS are games
of chance. Odds are disclosed and outcomes are decided by a public randomness
beacon, but a participant can lose their entire stake on any entry: most
Superstore boxes pay less than their price, the expected result of a full
CLIMB run is forfeiting the book, and every COINflip bet carries a negative
expectation equal to its 5% fee. SPACEX INVADERS carries a negative
expectation from two sources rather than one: its multiplier board returns
about 90% of the stake on average before any fee, disclosed in the printed
alien multipliers, and its 5% fee applies on top, for a combined expected
return of about 85.5%. COINflip and SPACEX INVADERS additionally pay their
winners in a tokenized stock, whose price moves and whose sale is gated on
market hours. CLIMB, INC., the Superstore, COINflip, and SPACEX INVADERS are
restricted to participants aged 18 or older. Each program's own page is its
controlling disclosure.

## 14. Borrowing against the share

The [Lombard Credit Facility](/lending) is a live Morpho market.
Borrowers against wsNET collateral face liquidation if the credited value
of their collateral falls, interest rates float with utilization, and the
facility is a second Morpho dependency beyond the Treasury deployment in
§5. Depositors' USDG is lent to those borrowers and earns only what they
pay.

## 15. Forward-looking statements

The founding shareholder register and share certificate confer **no perk
promised in code**. Any statement in these documents about the future is a
statement about a formula's output under assumptions, and the assumptions
are yours to reject.

> THE FOREGOING DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE A COMPLETE LIST. THE COMPLETE LIST
> IS UNWRITEABLE. THAT IS ITSELF A RISK FACTOR.
